PIPA / SOPA: kui tasuta sisu võib meid tappa

streigipaber

Many companies are blacking out their sites in an effort to fight the Protect IP (PIPA)/SOPA Act that's under review here in the United States. Rather than climbing onboard the wagon and shutting down my site, I thought it would be more constructive to share my reaction with you.

Meil on üle 2,500 ajaveebipostituse edendama technology that assists agencies and marketers throughout the world. We've never charged for any of our content, nor would we. When we are pitched, we often take the time to review the product or story – and we post the information at no cost. We've had incredible notes from companies that said that we were the only blog that took notice and it led to significant exposure and growth for their tools.

We're on a first name basis with many in the technology and public relations industries because we're eager to help. While other blogs like to rip apart a company or technology, you'll find that our posts are overwhelmingly supportive. We want you to succeed. We want you to succeed with solutions. We want to find those solutions.

Teised ettevõtted toetavad meid sponsorluse kaudu. Zoomerang (nüüd SurveyMonkey) oli meie esimene ametlik sponsor, a tasuta veebiküsitluste tarkvara see on oluliselt parandanud meie kirjutamist ja interaktiivsust lugejatega. Delivra on e-posti turundusettevõte kes pakub sisu ja uuringuid e-posti turundajatele. Otse interaktiivne on juhtiv automaatika turunduslahendus kes aitab meil mõista kliendi eluaegne turundus.

With our sponsors and advertisers, we've been able to host a turundus podcast, are developing a great email newsletter, we've begun developing videos and we continue to enhance the experience of our site. We even have a mobiilne rakendus right around the corner! Webinars are on our short list as well. All of that is free to you – our readers. While we don't profit from the blog directly, the funds are invested to help sa. Muidugi on meil kasu esietenduse ajaveebi pidamisest ... aga loodetavasti ka teie.

See võib muutuda.

Täna kohtusime Indiana osariigis oma kohalike esindajatega, et arutada meie muret Rahvusvahelisega Kaitske IP-akti ja SOPA-d. While the leaders were responsive, they didn't say whether or not our representative was supporting the bill. Here's some additional information – but please read my notes below with my concerns.

As far as our representatives are concerned, the DNS blocking has been overstated and requires a third party to determine whether or not to actually block the site. The verbiage leans in the direction that the only sites that could get blocked are foreign sites. I'm not an attorney, so I'm not sure if that's true or not.

Mis juhtub koheselt, ilma nõuetekohase menetluseta, on see, et autoriõiguste rikkumist toetava saidi saab otsingumootoritest eemaldada ja kõik reklaamitulud blokeerida. See võib juhtuda ilma ette teatamata ja ilma saidi võimeta ennast kaitsta. Meie otsingumootori külastused ja tulud on vereringe, mis võimaldab sellel ajaveebil laienemist jätkata. Teisisõnu, kui juriidilise taibukusega korporatsioon, kes soovib meie jagatud sisuga sõtta minna, võib meie ajaveebi surmani kägistada ilma abita.

I was reassured on the phone that this was highly unlikely, that we'd be able to get representation and fight the issue. Here's the problem… that takes time and money that I don't have as a small business. So, rather than fight, it would be best for me to fold the site and go back and work for a big company. That's frightening.

Washington is a city full of attorneys. They often don't remember that those of us without the legal resources don't get to defend ourselves adequately. This, in my opinion, is what the Protect IP and SOPA Acts have been written to do. They are a tool of a dying industry… a last gasp to try to prevent the inevitable. The analogy I provided was a storekeeper who refused to put locks on their door. Since they can't figure out how to protect themselves, they're now asking the government to guard it for them.

I'm not writing this simply from a single viewpoint of a blogger. We provide content as well with the expectation that our copyright be respected. At times it hasn't been and I've taken action. I've been able to block sites, report them to advertising systems, and have other companies – like stock photo companies – with deeper pockets go after them. That means little ol' Doug has been able to thwart infringement and fight it without the need of the government to get involved. Of course, this isn't about my intellectual property though – it's about the movie and record industry deteriorating profits.

It's tragic. And it's unfortunate that our political leaders are actually thinking about doing this. Even more tragic is that a demokraatlik juht, Chris Dodd, on nüüd selle jõu juht, mis purustab Interneti põhiomaduse - võime vabalt teavet jagada. See on seaduseelnõu, mis annab sügava taskuga inimestele veelgi õiguse ... ja eemaldab võimaluse jõuetult. See mõjutab kõiki Interneti kasutajaid, sealhulgas teid.

Please take the time to read the fine details and understand how it will impact you, your content, and your business. You need not be American, the Internet doesn't have borders we can put forces on… and those outside the United States are suurema riskiga kui me oleme. Lisateavet leiate aadressilt Peatage Ameerika tsensuur.

4 Kommentaarid

  1. 1

    Doug,

    Teie märkus, et „Selle asemel, et tülitseda, oleks mul kõige parem saidi kokku klappida ja minna tagasi suurde ettevõttesse. See on hirmutav. ”

    Ma arvan, et sa lõid seal naela pähe.

    Võib-olla olen ka väikeettevõtte omanikuna pisut erapoolik, kuid kõik see, mida ma näen poliitikutelt, innustab meid võtma tööle suurema süsteemi hammasratta. Ameeriklasi on vähe julgustatud tagasi pöörduma meie ettevõtlusjuurte juurde ja “Ameerika unistusest” on tehtud mingisugune “õiguste” pakett. Suurettevõte saab päästeabi, samas kui väikeettevõte tänapäeval sageli laenu ei saa.

    Kõik see tähendab, et SOPA ja PIPA seadused näivad sellega kooskõlas olevat. Ma loodan kindlasti, et mõlemad lüüakse täielikult maha, kuid tundes Washingtoni advokaate, pole see viimane, kui me sellistest aktidest kuuleme.

    Vajutage vennale ja tehke seda, mida teete.

    Brian

  2. 2

     Briani kommentaar vihjab millelegi, mis on juhtunud meil
    viimase 150 aasta jooksul, mis on suurte riikide jõupingutused
    üksused nagu valitsus, et kontrollida suhteliselt suurte inimeste elu
    kaitsetu. Meie valitsus on loonud sotsiaalprogrammid, mis sisuliselt
    ära võtta igasugune isiklik vastutus ja sisemine motivatsioon
    üksikisikutelt, põhjustades neile nii suurt sõltuvust süsteemist, et kardavad
    ebamugavustunne või vigastus hoiab neid lahkumast (meie 79 nädala pikkune
    töötuskindlustuse programm on suurepärane näide). Meie valitsus on
    aeglaselt, kuid kindlalt samme ettevõtluse kustutamiseks
    äravõtmine üksikisikutele teenitavatest hüvedest (maksude,
    regulatsioonid, sotsialism ja muu) ning keeldudes tunnistamast, et see on nii
    üks vähestest asjadest, mis võimaldas Ameerikal kasvada maailmaks
    jõud selle loomisest kuni 20. sajandini.

  3. 3
  4. 4

Mis sa arvad?

Sellel saidil kasutatakse rämpsposti vähendamiseks Akismetit. Vaadake, kuidas teie andmeid töödeldakse.